Search Results (3364 CVEs found)

CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2026-41267 1 Flowiseai 1 Flowise 2026-04-24 8.1 High
Flowise is a drag & drop user interface to build a customized large language model flow. Prior to 3.1.0, an improper mass assignment (JSON injection) vulnerability in the account registration endpoint of Flowise Cloud allows unauthenticated attackers to inject server-managed fields and nested objects during account creation. This enables client-controlled manipulation of ownership metadata, timestamps, organization association, and role mappings, breaking trust boundaries in a multi-tenant environment. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.0.
CVE-2026-41060 1 Wwbn 1 Avideo 2026-04-24 7.7 High
WWBN AVideo is an open source video platform. In versions 29.0 and below, the `isSSRFSafeURL()` function in `objects/functions.php` contains a same-domain shortcircuit (lines 4290-4296) that allows any URL whose hostname matches `webSiteRootURL` to bypass all SSRF protections. Because the check compares only the hostname and ignores the port, an attacker can reach arbitrary ports on the AVideo server by using the site's public hostname with a non-standard port. The response body is saved to a web-accessible path, enabling full exfiltration. Commit a0156a6398362086390d949190f9d52a823000ba fixes the issue.
CVE-2026-40150 2 Mervinpraison, Praison 2 Praisonaiagents, Praisonaiagents 2026-04-24 7.7 High
PraisonAIAgents is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to 1.5.128, the web_crawl() function in praisonaiagents/tools/web_crawl_tools.py accepts arbitrary URLs from AI agents with zero validation. No scheme allowlisting, hostname/IP blocklisting, or private network checks are applied before fetching. This allows an attacker (or prompt injection in crawled content) to force the agent to fetch cloud metadata endpoints, internal services, or local files via file:// URLs. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.5.128.
CVE-2026-32186 1 Microsoft 1 Bing 2026-04-24 10 Critical
Server-side request forgery (ssrf) in Microsoft Bing allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
CVE-2026-23321 1 Linux 1 Linux Kernel 2026-04-23 5.5 Medium
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mptcp: pm: in-kernel: always mark signal+subflow endp as used Syzkaller managed to find a combination of actions that was generating this warning: msk->pm.local_addr_used == 0 WARNING: net/mptcp/pm_kernel.c:1071 at __mark_subflow_endp_available net/mptcp/pm_kernel.c:1071 [inline], CPU#1: syz.2.17/961 WARNING: net/mptcp/pm_kernel.c:1071 at mptcp_nl_remove_subflow_and_signal_addr net/mptcp/pm_kernel.c:1103 [inline], CPU#1: syz.2.17/961 WARNING: net/mptcp/pm_kernel.c:1071 at mptcp_pm_nl_del_addr_doit+0x81d/0x8f0 net/mptcp/pm_kernel.c:1210, CPU#1: syz.2.17/961 Modules linked in: CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 961 Comm: syz.2.17 Not tainted 6.19.0-08368-gfafda3b4b06b #22 PREEMPT(full) Hardware name: QEMU Ubuntu 25.10 PC v2 (i440FX + PIIX, + 10.1 machine, 1996), BIOS 1.17.0-debian-1.17.0-1build1 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:__mark_subflow_endp_available net/mptcp/pm_kernel.c:1071 [inline] RIP: 0010:mptcp_nl_remove_subflow_and_signal_addr net/mptcp/pm_kernel.c:1103 [inline] RIP: 0010:mptcp_pm_nl_del_addr_doit+0x81d/0x8f0 net/mptcp/pm_kernel.c:1210 Code: 89 c5 e8 46 30 6f fe e9 21 fd ff ff 49 83 ed 80 e8 38 30 6f fe 4c 89 ef be 03 00 00 00 e8 db 49 df fe eb ac e8 24 30 6f fe 90 <0f> 0b 90 e9 1d ff ff ff e8 16 30 6f fe eb 05 e8 0f 30 6f fe e8 9a RSP: 0018:ffffc90001663880 EFLAGS: 00010293 RAX: ffffffff82de1a6c RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffff88800722b500 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: ffff8880158b22d0 R08: 0000000000010425 R09: ffffffffffffffff R10: ffffffff82de18ba R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff88800641a640 R13: ffff8880158b1880 R14: ffff88801ec3c900 R15: ffff88800641a650 FS: 00005555722c3500(0000) GS:ffff8880f909d000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f66346e0f60 CR3: 000000001607c000 CR4: 0000000000350ef0 Call Trace: <TASK> genl_family_rcv_msg_doit+0x117/0x180 net/netlink/genetlink.c:1115 genl_family_rcv_msg net/netlink/genetlink.c:1195 [inline] genl_rcv_msg+0x3a8/0x3f0 net/netlink/genetlink.c:1210 netlink_rcv_skb+0x16d/0x240 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2550 genl_rcv+0x28/0x40 net/netlink/genetlink.c:1219 netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1318 [inline] netlink_unicast+0x3e9/0x4c0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1344 netlink_sendmsg+0x4aa/0x5b0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1894 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:727 [inline] __sock_sendmsg+0xc9/0xf0 net/socket.c:742 ____sys_sendmsg+0x272/0x3b0 net/socket.c:2592 ___sys_sendmsg+0x2de/0x320 net/socket.c:2646 __sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2678 [inline] __do_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2683 [inline] __se_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2681 [inline] __x64_sys_sendmsg+0x110/0x1a0 net/socket.c:2681 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x143/0x440 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7f66346f826d Code: ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 90 f3 0f 1e fa 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 e8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007ffc83d8bdc8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002e RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f6634985fa0 RCX: 00007f66346f826d RDX: 00000000040000b0 RSI: 0000200000000740 RDI: 0000000000000007 RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f6634985fa8 R13: 00007f6634985fac R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000001770 </TASK> The actions that caused that seem to be: - Set the MPTCP subflows limit to 0 - Create an MPTCP endpoint with both the 'signal' and 'subflow' flags - Create a new MPTCP connection from a different address: an ADD_ADDR linked to the MPTCP endpoint will be sent ('signal' flag), but no subflows is initiated ('subflow' flag) - Remove the MPTCP endpoint ---truncated---
CVE-2026-23426 1 Linux 1 Linux Kernel 2026-04-23 5.5 Medium
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/logicvc: Fix device node reference leak in logicvc_drm_config_parse() The logicvc_drm_config_parse() function calls of_get_child_by_name() to find the "layers" node but fails to release the reference, leading to a device node reference leak. Fix this by using the __free(device_node) cleanup attribute to automatic release the reference when the variable goes out of scope.
CVE-2026-23430 1 Linux 1 Linux Kernel 2026-04-23 5.5 Medium
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/vmwgfx: Don't overwrite KMS surface dirty tracker We were overwriting the surface's dirty tracker here causing a memory leak.
CVE-2026-35587 1 Nicolargo 1 Glances 2026-04-23 8.8 High
Glances is an open-source system cross-platform monitoring tool. Prior to version 4.5.4, a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in the Glances IP plugin due to improper validation of the public_api configuration parameter. The value of public_api is used directly in outbound HTTP requests without any scheme restriction or hostname/IP validation. An attacker who can modify the Glances configuration can force the application to send requests to arbitrary internal or external endpoints. Additionally, when public_username and public_password are set, Glances automatically includes these credentials in the Authorization: Basic header, resulting in credential leakage to attacker-controlled servers. This vulnerability can be exploited to access internal network services, retrieve sensitive data from cloud metadata endpoints, and/or exfiltrate credentials via outbound HTTP requests. The issue arises because public_api is passed directly to the HTTP client (urlopen_auth) without validation, allowing unrestricted outbound connections and unintended disclosure of sensitive information. Version 4.5.4 contains a patch.
CVE-2026-39842 1 Openremote 1 Openremote 2026-04-23 10 Critical
OpenRemote is an open-source IoT platform. Versions 1.21.0 and below contain two interrelated expression injection vulnerabilities in the rules engine that allow arbitrary code execution on the server. The JavaScript rules engine executes user-supplied scripts via Nashorn's ScriptEngine.eval() without sandboxing, class filtering, or access restrictions, and the authorization check in RulesResourceImpl only restricts Groovy rules to superusers while leaving JavaScript rules unrestricted for any user with the write:rules role. Additionally, the Groovy rules engine has a GroovyDenyAllFilter security filter that is defined but never registered, as the registration code is commented out, rendering the SandboxTransformer ineffective for superuser-created Groovy rules. A non-superuser attacker with the write:rules role can create JavaScript rulesets that execute with full JVM access, enabling remote code execution as root, arbitrary file read, environment variable theft including database credentials, and complete multi-tenant isolation bypass to access data across all realms. This issue has been fixed in version 1.22.0.
CVE-2026-41055 1 Wwbn 1 Avideo 2026-04-23 8.6 High
WWBN AVideo is an open source video platform. In versions 29.0 and below, an incomplete SSRF fix in AVideo's LiveLinks proxy adds `isSSRFSafeURL()` validation but leaves DNS TOCTOU vulnerabilities where DNS rebinding between validation and the actual HTTP request redirects traffic to internal endpoints. Commit 8d8fc0cadb425835b4861036d589abcea4d78ee8 contains an updated fix.
CVE-2026-24360 2 Craig Hewitt, Wordpress 2 Seriously Simple Podcasting, Wordpress 2026-04-23 4.4 Medium
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Craig Hewitt Seriously Simple Podcasting seriously-simple-podcasting allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects Seriously Simple Podcasting: from n/a through <= 3.14.1.
CVE-2025-68893 2 Hetworks, Wordpress 2 Wordpress Image Shrinker, Wordpress 2026-04-23 4.9 Medium
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in HETWORKS WordPress Image shrinker wp-image-shrinker allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects WordPress Image shrinker: from n/a through <= 1.1.0.
CVE-2025-62988 1 Wordpress 1 Wordpress 2026-04-23 4.9 Medium
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Codeless Slider Templates slider-templates allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects Slider Templates: from n/a through <= 1.0.3.
CVE-2025-62088 2 Extendons, Wordpress 2 Wordpress & Woocommerce Scraper Plugin, Wordpress 2026-04-23 5.4 Medium
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in extendons WordPress & WooCommerce Scraper Plugin, Import Data from Any Site wp_scraper allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects WordPress & WooCommerce Scraper Plugin, Import Data from Any Site: from n/a through <= 1.0.7.
CVE-2025-60181 1 Wordpress 1 Wordpress 2026-04-23 5.4 Medium
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in silence Silencesoft RSS Reader external-rss-reader allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects Silencesoft RSS Reader: from n/a through <= 0.6.
CVE-2025-60161 1 Wordpress 1 Wordpress 2026-04-23 5.4 Medium
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in bdthemes ZoloBlocks zoloblocks allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects ZoloBlocks: from n/a through <= 2.3.11.
CVE-2025-59138 1 Wordpress 1 Wordpress 2026-04-23 4.9 Medium
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Jthemes Genemy genemy allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects Genemy: from n/a through <= 1.6.6.
CVE-2025-58977 2 Winwar, Wordpress 2 Wp Ebay Product Feeds, Wordpress 2026-04-23 4.9 Medium
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Rhys Wynne WP eBay Product Feeds ebay-feeds-for-wordpress allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects WP eBay Product Feeds: from n/a through <= 3.4.8.
CVE-2025-58962 1 Wordpress 1 Wordpress 2026-04-23 6.4 Medium
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in publitio Publitio publitio allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects Publitio: from n/a through <= 2.2.1.
CVE-2025-58829 2026-04-23 4.9 Medium
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in aitool Ai Auto Tool Content Writing Assistant (Gemini Writer, ChatGPT ) All in One ai-auto-tool allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects Ai Auto Tool Content Writing Assistant (Gemini Writer, ChatGPT ) All in One: from n/a through <= 2.3.3.