Export limit exceeded: 10028 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (10028 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-40458 | 1 Pac4j | 1 Pac4j | 2026-04-20 | 6.5 Medium |
| PAC4J is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF). A malicious attacker can craft a specially designed website which, when visited by a user, will automatically submit a forged cross-site request with a token whose hash collides with the victim's legitimate CSRF token. Importantly, the attacker does not need to know the victim’s CSRF token or its hash prior to the attack. Collisions in the deterministic String.hashCode() function can be computed directly, reducing the effective token's security space to 32 bits. This bypasses CSRF protection, allowing profile updates, password changes, account linking, and any other state-changing operations to be performed without the victim's consent. This issue was fixed in PAC4J versions 5.7.10 and 6.4.1 | ||||
| CVE-2026-23950 | 1 Isaacs | 1 Tar | 2026-04-18 | 8.8 High |
| node-tar,a Tar for Node.js, has a race condition vulnerability in versions up to and including 7.5.3. This is due to an incomplete handling of Unicode path collisions in the `path-reservations` system. On case-insensitive or normalization-insensitive filesystems (such as macOS APFS, In which it has been tested), the library fails to lock colliding paths (e.g., `ß` and `ss`), allowing them to be processed in parallel. This bypasses the library's internal concurrency safeguards and permits Symlink Poisoning attacks via race conditions. The library uses a `PathReservations` system to ensure that metadata checks and file operations for the same path are serialized. This prevents race conditions where one entry might clobber another concurrently. This is a Race Condition which enables Arbitrary File Overwrite. This vulnerability affects users and systems using node-tar on macOS (APFS/HFS+). Because of using `NFD` Unicode normalization (in which `ß` and `ss` are different), conflicting paths do not have their order properly preserved under filesystems that ignore Unicode normalization (e.g., APFS (in which `ß` causes an inode collision with `ss`)). This enables an attacker to circumvent internal parallelization locks (`PathReservations`) using conflicting filenames within a malicious tar archive. The patch in version 7.5.4 updates `path-reservations.js` to use a normalization form that matches the target filesystem's behavior (e.g., `NFKD`), followed by first `toLocaleLowerCase('en')` and then `toLocaleUpperCase('en')`. As a workaround, users who cannot upgrade promptly, and who are programmatically using `node-tar` to extract arbitrary tarball data should filter out all `SymbolicLink` entries (as npm does) to defend against arbitrary file writes via this file system entry name collision issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-24007 | 1 Enalean | 1 Tuleap | 2026-04-18 | 4.6 Medium |
| Tuleap is an Open Source Suite for management of software development and collaboration. Tuleap is missing CSRF protection in the Overview inconsistent items. An attacker could use this vulnerability to trick victims into repairing inconsistent items (creating artifact links from the release). This vulnerability is fixed in Tuleap Community Edition 17.0.99.1768924735 and Tuleap Enterprise Edition 17.2-5, 17.1-6, and 17.0-9. | ||||
| CVE-2026-24434 | 1 Tenda | 2 Ac7, Ac7 Firmware | 2026-04-18 | 6.5 Medium |
| Shenzhen Tenda AC7 firmware version V03.03.03.01_cn and prior does not implement CSRF protections for administrative functions in the web management interface. The interface does not enforce anti-CSRF tokens or robust origin validation, which can allow an attacker to induce a logged-in administrator to perform unintended state-changing requests and modify router settings. | ||||
| CVE-2026-28271 | 2 Accellion, Kiteworks | 2 Kiteworks, Security-advisories | 2026-04-18 | 6.5 Medium |
| Kiteworks is a private data network (PDN). Prior to version 9.2.0, a vulnerability in Kiteworks configuration functionality allows bypassing of SSRF protections through DNS rebinding attacks. Malicious administrators could exploit this to access internal services that should be restricted. Version 9.2.0 contains a patch for the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-1468 | 1 Opensolution | 1 Quick.cms | 2026-04-18 | N/A |
| QuickCMS is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery across multiple endpoints. An attacker can craft special website, which when visited by the victim, will automatically send a POST request with victim's privileges. This software does not implement any protection against this type of attack. All forms available in this software are potentially vulnerable. The vendor was notified early about this vulnerability, but didn't respond with the details of vulnerability or vulnerable version range. Only version 6.8 was tested and confirmed as vulnerable, other versions were not tested and might also be vulnerable. | ||||
| CVE-2019-25693 | 2 Montala, Resourcespace | 2 Resourcespace, Resourcespace | 2026-04-18 | 7.1 High |
| ResourceSpace 8.6 contains an SQL injection vulnerability that allows authenticated attackers to execute arbitrary SQL queries by injecting malicious code through the keywords parameter in collection_edit.php. Attackers can submit POST requests with crafted SQL payloads in the keywords field to extract sensitive database information including schema names, user credentials, and other confidential data. | ||||
| CVE-2026-22194 | 1 Gestsup | 1 Gestsup | 2026-04-18 | 8.8 High |
| GestSup versions up to and including 3.2.60 contain a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability where the application does not verify the authenticity of client requests. An attacker can induce a logged-in user to submit crafted requests that perform actions with the victim's privileges. This can be exploited to create privileged accounts by targeting the administrative user creation endpoint. | ||||
| CVE-2026-22030 | 1 Shopify | 2 React-router, Remix-run\/react | 2026-04-18 | 6.5 Medium |
| React Router is a router for React. In @remix-run/server-runtime version prior to 2.17.3. and react-router 7.0.0 through 7.11.0, React Router (or Remix v2) is vulnerable to CSRF attacks on document POST requests to UI routes when using server-side route action handlers in Framework Mode, or when using React Server Actions in the new unstable RSC modes. There is no impact if Declarative Mode (<BrowserRouter>) or Data Mode (createBrowserRouter/<RouterProvider>) is being used. This issue has been patched in @remix-run/server-runtime version 2.17.3 and react-router version 7.12.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-22800 | 1 Thm | 1 Pilos | 2026-04-18 | 2.4 Low |
| PILOS (Platform for Interactive Live-Online Seminars) is a frontend for BigBlueButton. Prior to 4.10.0, Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in an administrative API endpoint responsible for terminating all active video conferences on a single server. The affected endpoint performs a destructive action but is exposed via an HTTP GET request. Although proper authorization checks are enforced and the endpoint cannot be triggered cross-site, the use of GET allows the action to be implicitly invoked through same-site content (e.g. embedded resources rendered within the application). As a result, an authenticated administrator who views crafted content within the application may unknowingly trigger the endpoint, causing all active video conferences on the server to be terminated without explicit intent or confirmation. This vulnerability is fixed in 4.10.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-23622 | 2 Alextselegidis, Easyappointments | 2 Easyappointments, Easy\!appointments | 2026-04-18 | 8.8 High |
| Easy!Appointments is a self hosted appointment scheduler. In 1.5.2 and earlier, application/core/EA_Security.php::csrf_verify() only enforces CSRF for POST requests and returns early for non-POST methods. Several application endpoints perform state-changing operations while accepting parameters from GET (or $_REQUEST), so an attacker can perform CSRF by forcing a victim's browser to issue a crafted GET request. Impact: creation of admin accounts, modification of admin email/password, and full admin account takeover. | ||||
| CVE-2026-1153 | 1 Technical-laohu | 1 Mpay | 2026-04-18 | 4.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability was detected in technical-laohu mpay up to 1.2.4. This affects an unknown function. Performing a manipulation results in cross-site request forgery. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit is now public and may be used. | ||||
| CVE-2026-25151 | 2 Qwik, Qwikdev | 2 Qwik, Qwik | 2026-04-18 | 5.9 Medium |
| Qwik is a performance focused javascript framework. Prior to version 1.19.0, Qwik City’s server-side request handler inconsistently interprets HTTP request headers, which can be abused by a remote attacker to circumvent form submission CSRF protections using specially crafted or multi-valued Content-Type headers. This issue has been patched in version 1.19.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-24321 | 1 Sap | 1 Commerce Cloud | 2026-04-18 | 5.3 Medium |
| SAP Commerce Cloud exposes multiple API endpoints to unauthenticated users, allowing them to submit requests to these open endpoints to retrieve sensitive information that is not intended to be publicly accessible via the front-end. This vulnerability has a low impact on confidentiality and does not affect integrity and availability. | ||||
| CVE-2026-26007 | 2 Cryptography.io, Pyca | 2 Cryptography, Cryptography | 2026-04-18 | 6.5 Medium |
| cryptography is a package designed to expose cryptographic primitives and recipes to Python developers. Prior to 46.0.5, the public_key_from_numbers (or EllipticCurvePublicNumbers.public_key()), EllipticCurvePublicNumbers.public_key(), load_der_public_key() and load_pem_public_key() functions do not verify that the point belongs to the expected prime-order subgroup of the curve. This missing validation allows an attacker to provide a public key point P from a small-order subgroup. This can lead to security issues in various situations, such as the most commonly used signature verification (ECDSA) and shared key negotiation (ECDH). When the victim computes the shared secret as S = [victim_private_key]P via ECDH, this leaks information about victim_private_key mod (small_subgroup_order). For curves with cofactor > 1, this reveals the least significant bits of the private key. When these weak public keys are used in ECDSA , it's easy to forge signatures on the small subgroup. Only SECT curves are impacted by this. This vulnerability is fixed in 46.0.5. | ||||
| CVE-2026-2317 | 4 Apple, Google, Linux and 1 more | 4 Macos, Chrome, Linux Kernel and 1 more | 2026-04-18 | 6.5 Medium |
| Inappropriate implementation in Animation in Google Chrome prior to 145.0.7632.45 allowed a remote attacker to leak cross-origin data via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||
| CVE-2026-26075 | 2 Fastgpt, Labring | 2 Fastgpt, Fastgpt | 2026-04-18 | 5.4 Medium |
| FastGPT is an AI Agent building platform. Due to the fact that FastGPT's web page acquisition nodes, HTTP nodes, etc. need to initiate data acquisition requests from the server, there are certain security issues. In addition to implementing internal network isolation in the deployment environment, this optimization has added stricter internal network address detection. This vulnerability is fixed in 4.14.7. | ||||
| CVE-2026-26317 | 1 Openclaw | 2 Clawdbot, Openclaw | 2026-04-18 | 7.1 High |
| OpenClaw is a personal AI assistant. Prior to 2026.2.14, browser-facing localhost mutation routes accepted cross-origin browser requests without explicit Origin/Referer validation. Loopback binding reduces remote exposure but does not prevent browser-initiated requests from malicious origins. A malicious website can trigger unauthorized state changes against a victim's local OpenClaw browser control plane (for example opening tabs, starting/stopping the browser, mutating storage/cookies) if the browser control service is reachable on loopback in the victim's browser context. Starting in version 2026.2.14, mutating HTTP methods (POST/PUT/PATCH/DELETE) are rejected when the request indicates a non-loopback Origin/Referer (or `Sec-Fetch-Site: cross-site`). Other mitigations include enabling browser control auth (token/password) and avoid running with auth disabled. | ||||
| CVE-2026-27146 | 1 Getsimple-ce | 1 Getsimple Cms | 2026-04-18 | 4.5 Medium |
| GetSimple CMS is a content management system. All versions of GetSimple CMS do not implement CSRF protection on the administrative file upload endpoint. As a result, an attacker can craft a malicious web page that silently triggers a file upload request from an authenticated victim’s browser. The request is accepted without requiring a CSRF token or origin validation. This allows an attacker to upload arbitrary files to the application without the victim’s knowledge or consent. In order to exploit this vulnerability, the victim must be authenticated to GetSimple CMS (e.g., admin user), and visit an attacker-controlled webpage. This issue does not have a fix at the time of publication. | ||||
| CVE-2026-27518 | 1 Binardat | 3 10g08-0800gsm, 10g08-0800gsm Firmware, 10g08-0800gsm Network Switch | 2026-04-18 | 4.3 Medium |
| Binardat 10G08-0800GSM network switch firmware version V300SP10260209 and prior lack CSRF protections for state-changing actions in the administrative interface. An attacker can trick an authenticated administrator into performing unauthorized configuration changes. | ||||