Export limit exceeded: 10336 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (10336 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-49748 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-04-22 | 9.8 Critical |
| In gatts_process_primary_service_req of gatt_sr.cc, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a heap buffer overflow. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2024-49747 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-04-22 | 9.8 Critical |
| In gatts_process_read_by_type_req of gatt_sr.cc, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2024-27655 | 1 Dlink | 3 Dir-823 Firmware, Dir-823g, Dir-823g Firmware | 2025-04-21 | 8.8 High |
| D-Link DIR-823G A1V1.0.2B05 was discovered to contain a buffer overflow via the SOAPACTION parameter. This vulnerability allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted input, and possibly remote code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2024-27656 | 1 Dlink | 3 Dir-823 Firmware, Dir-823g, Dir-823g Firmware | 2025-04-21 | 8.8 High |
| D-Link DIR-823G A1V1.0.2B05 was discovered to contain a buffer overflow via the Cookie parameter. This vulnerability allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted input, and possibly remote code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2024-27657 | 1 Dlink | 3 Dir-823 Firmware, Dir-823g, Dir-823g Firmware | 2025-04-21 | 8.8 High |
| D-Link DIR-823G A1V1.0.2B05 was discovered to contain a buffer overflow via the User-Agent parameter. This vulnerability allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted input, and possibly remote code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2024-43767 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-04-21 | 8.8 High |
| In prepare_to_draw_into_mask of SkBlurMaskFilterImpl.cpp, there is a possible heap overflow due to improper input validation. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2022-2566 | 1 Ffmpeg | 1 Ffmpeg | 2025-04-21 | 9 Critical |
| A heap out-of-bounds memory write exists in FFMPEG since version 5.1. The size calculation in `build_open_gop_key_points()` goes through all entries in the loop and adds `sc->ctts_data[i].count` to `sc->sample_offsets_count`. This can lead to an integer overflow resulting in a small allocation with `av_calloc()`. An attacker can cause remote code execution via a malicious mp4 file. We recommend upgrading past commit c953baa084607dd1d84c3bfcce3cf6a87c3e6e05 | ||||
| CVE-2022-41853 | 3 Debian, Hsqldb, Redhat | 8 Debian Linux, Hypersql Database, Camel Spring Boot and 5 more | 2025-04-21 | 8 High |
| Those using java.sql.Statement or java.sql.PreparedStatement in hsqldb (HyperSQL DataBase) to process untrusted input may be vulnerable to a remote code execution attack. By default it is allowed to call any static method of any Java class in the classpath resulting in code execution. The issue can be prevented by updating to 2.7.1 or by setting the system property "hsqldb.method_class_names" to classes which are allowed to be called. For example, System.setProperty("hsqldb.method_class_names", "abc") or Java argument -Dhsqldb.method_class_names="abc" can be used. From version 2.7.1 all classes by default are not accessible except those in java.lang.Math and need to be manually enabled. | ||||
| CVE-2017-0163 | 1 Microsoft | 5 Windows 10, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2008 and 2 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists when Windows Hyper-V Network Switch running on a host server fails to properly validate input from an authenticated user on a guest operating system, aka "Hyper-V Remote Code Execution Vulnerability." This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2017-0162, CVE-2017-0180, and CVE-2017-0181. | ||||
| CVE-2017-8630 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Office | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Microsoft Office 2016 allows a remote code execution vulnerability when it fails to properly handle objects in memory, aka "Microsoft Office Memory Corruption Vulnerability". This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2017-8631, CVE-2017-8632, and CVE-2017-8744. | ||||
| CVE-2017-8617 | 1 Microsoft | 2 Edge, Windows 10 | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Microsoft Edge in Windows 10 1703 Microsoft Edge allows a remote code execution vulnerability in the way affected Microsoft scripting engines render when handling objects in memory, aka "Microsoft Edge Remote Code Execution Vulnerability." | ||||
| CVE-2017-8541 | 1 Microsoft | 11 Exchange Server, Forefront Security, Malware Protection Engine and 8 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The Microsoft Malware Protection Engine running on Microsoft Forefront and Microsoft Defender on Microsoft Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, Windows RT 8.1, Windows 10 Gold, 1511, 1607, and 1703, and Windows Server 2016, Microsoft Exchange Server 2013 and 2016, does not properly scan a specially crafted file leading to memory corruption. aka "Microsoft Malware Protection Engine Remote Code Execution Vulnerability", a different vulnerability than CVE-2017-8538 and CVE-2017-8540. | ||||
| CVE-2017-8528 | 1 Microsoft | 6 Office, Windows 7, Windows 8.1 and 3 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Uniscribe in Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, Windows RT 8.1, Windows 10 Gold, 1511, 1607, Windows Server 2016, Microsoft Office 2007 SP3, and Microsoft Office 2010 SP2 allows a remote code execution vulnerability due to the way it handles objects in memory, aka "Windows Uniscribe Remote Code Execution Vulnerability". This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2017-0283. | ||||
| CVE-2017-8527 | 1 Microsoft | 11 Lync, Office, Silverlight and 8 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Graphics in Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, Windows RT 8.1, Windows 10 Gold, 1511, 1607, 1703, and Windows Server 2016 allows a remote code execution vulnerability due to the way it handles objects in memory, aka "Windows Graphics Remote Code Execution Vulnerability". | ||||
| CVE-2017-8502 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Excel | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Microsoft Office allows a remote code execution vulnerability due to the way that it handles objects in memory, aka "Microsoft Office Memory Corruption Vulnerability". This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2017-8501. | ||||
| CVE-2017-8501 | 1 Microsoft | 6 Excel, Excel Viewer, Office and 3 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Microsoft Office allows a remote code execution vulnerability due to the way that it handles objects in memory, aka "Microsoft Office Memory Corruption Vulnerability". This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2017-8502. | ||||
| CVE-2017-7694 | 1 Getsymphony | 1 Symphony | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Remote Code Execution vulnerability in symphony/content/content.blueprintsdatasources.php in Symphony CMS through 2.6.11 allows remote attackers to execute code and get a webshell from the back-end. The attacker must be authenticated and enter PHP code in the datasource editor or event editor. | ||||
| CVE-2017-7692 | 1 Squirrelmail | 1 Squirrelmail | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| SquirrelMail 1.4.22 (and other versions before 20170427_0200-SVN) allows post-authentication remote code execution via a sendmail.cf file that is mishandled in a popen call. It's possible to exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary shell commands on the remote server. The problem is in the Deliver_SendMail.class.php with the initStream function that uses escapeshellcmd() to sanitize the sendmail command before executing it. The use of escapeshellcmd() is not correct in this case since it doesn't escape whitespaces, allowing the injection of arbitrary command parameters. The problem is in -f$envelopefrom within the sendmail command line. Hence, if the target server uses sendmail and SquirrelMail is configured to use it as a command-line program, it's possible to trick sendmail into using an attacker-provided configuration file that triggers the execution of an arbitrary command. For exploitation, the attacker must upload a sendmail.cf file as an email attachment, and inject the sendmail.cf filename with the -C option within the "Options > Personal Informations > Email Address" setting. | ||||
| CVE-2017-7584 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 1 Foxit Pdf Toolkit | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Memory Corruption Vulnerability in Foxit PDF Toolkit before 2.1 allows an attacker to cause Denial of Service & Remote Code Execution when a victim opens a specially crafted PDF file. | ||||
| CVE-2017-6662 | 1 Cisco | 2 Evolved Programmable Network Manager, Prime Infrastructure | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A vulnerability in the web-based user interface of Cisco Prime Infrastructure (PI) and Evolved Programmable Network Manager (EPNM) could allow an authenticated, remote attacker read and write access to information stored in the affected system as well as perform remote code execution. The attacker must have valid user credentials. The vulnerability is due to improper handling of XML External Entity (XXE) entries when parsing an XML file. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by convincing the administrator of an affected system to import a crafted XML file with malicious entries which could allow the attacker to read and write files and execute remote code within the application, aka XML Injection. Cisco Prime Infrastructure software releases 1.1 through 3.1.6 are vulnerable. Cisco EPNM software releases 1.2, 2.0, and 2.1 are vulnerable. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvc23894 CSCvc49561. | ||||