Export limit exceeded: 10336 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (10336 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2017-8510 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Excel, Office, Word | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Microsoft Office when the software fails to properly handle objects in memory, aka "Office Remote Code Execution Vulnerability". This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2017-8509, CVE-2017-8511, CVE-2017-8512, CVE-2017-0260, and CVE-2017-8506. | ||||
| CVE-2017-8509 | 1 Microsoft | 8 Office, Office Compatibility Pack, Office Web Apps and 5 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Microsoft Office when the software fails to properly handle objects in memory, aka "Office Remote Code Execution Vulnerability". This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2017-8510, CVE-2017-8511, CVE-2017-8512, CVE-2017-0260, and CVE-2017-8506. | ||||
| CVE-2017-8507 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Outlook | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way Microsoft Office software parses specially crafted email messages, aka "Microsoft Office Memory Corruption Vulnerability". | ||||
| CVE-2017-8506 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Outlook | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Microsoft Office when the software fails to properly handle objects in memory, aka "Office Remote Code Execution Vulnerability". This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2017-8509, CVE-2017-8510, CVE-2017-8511, CVE-2017-8512, and CVE-2017-0260. | ||||
| CVE-2017-8567 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Excel For Mac | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Microsoft Excel for Mac 2011 when it fails to properly handle objects in memory, aka "Microsoft Office Remote Code Execution". | ||||
| CVE-2017-8303 | 1 Accellion | 1 File Transfer Appliance | 2025-04-20 | 9.8 Critical |
| An issue was discovered on Accellion FTA devices before FTA_9_12_180. seos/1000/find.api allows Remote Code Execution with shell metacharacters in the method parameter. | ||||
| CVE-2017-7617 | 1 Digium | 2 Asterisk, Certified Asterisk | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Remote code execution can occur in Asterisk Open Source 13.x before 13.14.1 and 14.x before 14.3.1 and Certified Asterisk 13.13 before 13.13-cert3 because of a buffer overflow in a CDR user field, related to X-ClientCode in chan_sip, the CDR dialplan function, and the AMI Monitor action. | ||||
| CVE-2017-7480 | 1 Rootkit Hunter Project | 1 Rootkit Hunter | 2025-04-20 | 9.8 Critical |
| rkhunter versions before 1.4.4 are vulnerable to file download over insecure channel when doing mirror update resulting into potential remote code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2017-6326 | 1 Symantec | 1 Messaging Gateway | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The Symantec Messaging Gateway can encounter an issue of remote code execution, which describes a situation whereby an individual may obtain the ability to execute commands remotely on a target machine or in a target process. | ||||
| CVE-2017-6325 | 1 Symantec | 1 Messaging Gateway | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The Symantec Messaging Gateway can encounter a file inclusion vulnerability, which is a type of vulnerability that is most commonly found to affect web applications that rely on a scripting run time. This issue is caused when an application builds a path to executable code using an attacker-controlled variable in a way that allows the attacker to control which file is executed at run time. This file inclusion vulnerability subverts how an application loads code for execution. Successful exploitation of a file inclusion vulnerability will result in remote code execution on the web server that runs the affected web application. | ||||
| CVE-2017-5641 | 2 Apache, Hp | 2 Flex Blazeds, Xp Command View Advanced Edition | 2025-04-20 | 9.8 Critical |
| Previous versions of Apache Flex BlazeDS (4.7.2 and earlier) did not restrict which types were allowed for AMF(X) object deserialization by default. During the deserialization process code is executed that for several known types has undesired side-effects. Other, unknown types may also exhibit such behaviors. One vector in the Java standard library exists that allows an attacker to trigger possibly further exploitable Java deserialization of untrusted data. Other known vectors in third party libraries can be used to trigger remote code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2017-5215 | 1 Codextrous | 1 B2j Contact | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The Codextrous B2J Contact (aka b2j_contact) extension before 2.1.13 for Joomla! allows a rename attack that bypasses a "safe file extension" protection mechanism, leading to remote code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2017-5177 | 1 Vipa Controls | 2 Winplc7, Winplc7 Firmware | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A Stack Buffer Overflow issue was discovered in VIPA Controls WinPLC7 5.0.45.5921 and prior. A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability has been identified, where an attacker with a specially crafted packet could overflow the fixed length buffer. This could allow remote code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2017-4997 | 1 Dell | 1 Emc Vasa Provider Virtual Appliance | 2025-04-20 | 9.8 Critical |
| EMC VASA Provider Virtual Appliance versions 8.3.x and prior has an unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability that could potentially be exploited by malicious users to compromise the affected system. | ||||
| CVE-2017-4933 | 2 Apple, Vmware | 4 Mac Os X, Esxi, Fusion and 1 more | 2025-04-20 | 8.8 High |
| VMware ESXi (6.5 before ESXi650-201710401-BG), Workstation (12.x before 12.5.8), and Fusion (8.x before 8.5.9) contain a vulnerability that could allow an authenticated VNC session to cause a heap overflow via a specific set of VNC packets resulting in heap corruption. Successful exploitation of this issue could result in remote code execution in a virtual machine via the authenticated VNC session. Note: In order for exploitation to be possible in ESXi, VNC must be manually enabled in a virtual machine's .vmx configuration file. In addition, ESXi must be configured to allow VNC traffic through the built-in firewall. | ||||
| CVE-2017-3761 | 1 Lenovo | 1 Service Framework | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The Lenovo Service Framework Android application executes some system commands without proper sanitization of external input. In certain cases, this could lead to command injection which, in turn, could lead to remote code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2017-3760 | 1 Lenovo | 1 Service Framework | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The Lenovo Service Framework Android application uses a set of nonsecure credentials when performing integrity verification of downloaded applications and/or data. This exposes the application to man-in-the-middle attacks leading to possible remote code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2017-3759 | 1 Lenovo | 1 Service Framework | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The Lenovo Service Framework Android application accepts some responses from the server without proper validation. This exposes the application to man-in-the-middle attacks leading to possible remote code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2017-3758 | 1 Lenovo | 1 Service Framework | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Improper access controls on several Android components in the Lenovo Service Framework application can be exploited to enable remote code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2017-2896 | 2 Debian, Libxls Project | 2 Debian Linux, Libxls | 2025-04-20 | 7.8 High |
| An exploitable out-of-bounds write vulnerability exists in the xls_mergedCells function of libxls 1.4. . A specially crafted XLS file can cause a memory corruption resulting in remote code execution. An attacker can send malicious XLS file to trigger this vulnerability. | ||||