drm: Prevent drm_copy_field() to attempt copying a NULL pointer
There are some struct drm_driver fields that are required by drivers since
drm_copy_field() attempts to copy them to user-space via DRM_IOCTL_VERSION.
But it can be possible that a driver has a bug and did not set some of the
fields, which leads to drm_copy_field() attempting to copy a NULL pointer:
[ +10.395966] Unable to handle kernel access to user memory outside uaccess routines at virtual address 0000000000000000
[ +0.010955] Mem abort info:
[ +0.002835] ESR = 0x0000000096000004
[ +0.003872] EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits
[ +0.005395] SET = 0, FnV = 0
[ +0.003113] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0
[ +0.003182] FSC = 0x04: level 0 translation fault
[ +0.004964] Data abort info:
[ +0.002919] ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000004
[ +0.003886] CM = 0, WnR = 0
[ +0.003040] user pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=0000000115dad000
[ +0.006536] [0000000000000000] pgd=0000000000000000, p4d=0000000000000000
[ +0.006925] Internal error: Oops: 96000004 [#1] SMP
...
[ +0.011113] pstate: 80400005 (Nzcv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
[ +0.007061] pc : __pi_strlen+0x14/0x150
[ +0.003895] lr : drm_copy_field+0x30/0x1a4
[ +0.004156] sp : ffff8000094b3a50
[ +0.003355] x29: ffff8000094b3a50 x28: ffff8000094b3b70 x27: 0000000000000040
[ +0.007242] x26: ffff443743c2ba00 x25: 0000000000000000 x24: 0000000000000040
[ +0.007243] x23: ffff443743c2ba00 x22: ffff8000094b3b70 x21: 0000000000000000
[ +0.007241] x20: 0000000000000000 x19: ffff8000094b3b90 x18: 0000000000000000
[ +0.007241] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 x15: 0000aaab14b9af40
[ +0.007241] x14: 0000000000000000 x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000000
[ +0.007239] x11: 0000000000000000 x10: 0000000000000000 x9 : ffffa524ad67d4d8
[ +0.007242] x8 : 0101010101010101 x7 : 7f7f7f7f7f7f7f7f x6 : 6c6e6263606e7141
[ +0.007239] x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 0000000000000000
[ +0.007241] x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : ffff8000094b3b90 x0 : 0000000000000000
[ +0.007240] Call trace:
[ +0.002475] __pi_strlen+0x14/0x150
[ +0.003537] drm_version+0x84/0xac
[ +0.003448] drm_ioctl_kernel+0xa8/0x16c
[ +0.003975] drm_ioctl+0x270/0x580
[ +0.003448] __arm64_sys_ioctl+0xb8/0xfc
[ +0.003978] invoke_syscall+0x78/0x100
[ +0.003799] el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x4c/0xf4
[ +0.004767] do_el0_svc+0x38/0x4c
[ +0.003357] el0_svc+0x34/0x100
[ +0.003185] el0t_64_sync_handler+0x11c/0x150
[ +0.004418] el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194
[ +0.003716] Code: 92402c04 b200c3e8 f13fc09f 5400088c (a9400c02)
[ +0.006180] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
Analysis and contextual insights are available on OpenCVE Cloud.
No vendor fix or workaround currently provided.
Additional remediation guidance may be available on OpenCVE Cloud.
Tracking
Sign in to view the affected projects.
No advisories yet.
Wed, 31 Dec 2025 12:15:00 +0000
| Type | Values Removed | Values Added |
|---|---|---|
| References |
| |
| Metrics |
threat_severity
|
cvssV3_1
|
Tue, 30 Dec 2025 12:45:00 +0000
| Type | Values Removed | Values Added |
|---|---|---|
| Description | In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm: Prevent drm_copy_field() to attempt copying a NULL pointer There are some struct drm_driver fields that are required by drivers since drm_copy_field() attempts to copy them to user-space via DRM_IOCTL_VERSION. But it can be possible that a driver has a bug and did not set some of the fields, which leads to drm_copy_field() attempting to copy a NULL pointer: [ +10.395966] Unable to handle kernel access to user memory outside uaccess routines at virtual address 0000000000000000 [ +0.010955] Mem abort info: [ +0.002835] ESR = 0x0000000096000004 [ +0.003872] EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits [ +0.005395] SET = 0, FnV = 0 [ +0.003113] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 [ +0.003182] FSC = 0x04: level 0 translation fault [ +0.004964] Data abort info: [ +0.002919] ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000004 [ +0.003886] CM = 0, WnR = 0 [ +0.003040] user pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=0000000115dad000 [ +0.006536] [0000000000000000] pgd=0000000000000000, p4d=0000000000000000 [ +0.006925] Internal error: Oops: 96000004 [#1] SMP ... [ +0.011113] pstate: 80400005 (Nzcv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) [ +0.007061] pc : __pi_strlen+0x14/0x150 [ +0.003895] lr : drm_copy_field+0x30/0x1a4 [ +0.004156] sp : ffff8000094b3a50 [ +0.003355] x29: ffff8000094b3a50 x28: ffff8000094b3b70 x27: 0000000000000040 [ +0.007242] x26: ffff443743c2ba00 x25: 0000000000000000 x24: 0000000000000040 [ +0.007243] x23: ffff443743c2ba00 x22: ffff8000094b3b70 x21: 0000000000000000 [ +0.007241] x20: 0000000000000000 x19: ffff8000094b3b90 x18: 0000000000000000 [ +0.007241] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 x15: 0000aaab14b9af40 [ +0.007241] x14: 0000000000000000 x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000000 [ +0.007239] x11: 0000000000000000 x10: 0000000000000000 x9 : ffffa524ad67d4d8 [ +0.007242] x8 : 0101010101010101 x7 : 7f7f7f7f7f7f7f7f x6 : 6c6e6263606e7141 [ +0.007239] x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 0000000000000000 [ +0.007241] x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : ffff8000094b3b90 x0 : 0000000000000000 [ +0.007240] Call trace: [ +0.002475] __pi_strlen+0x14/0x150 [ +0.003537] drm_version+0x84/0xac [ +0.003448] drm_ioctl_kernel+0xa8/0x16c [ +0.003975] drm_ioctl+0x270/0x580 [ +0.003448] __arm64_sys_ioctl+0xb8/0xfc [ +0.003978] invoke_syscall+0x78/0x100 [ +0.003799] el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x4c/0xf4 [ +0.004767] do_el0_svc+0x38/0x4c [ +0.003357] el0_svc+0x34/0x100 [ +0.003185] el0t_64_sync_handler+0x11c/0x150 [ +0.004418] el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194 [ +0.003716] Code: 92402c04 b200c3e8 f13fc09f 5400088c (a9400c02) [ +0.006180] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- | |
| Title | drm: Prevent drm_copy_field() to attempt copying a NULL pointer | |
| First Time appeared |
Linux
Linux linux Kernel |
|
| CPEs | cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* | |
| Vendors & Products |
Linux
Linux linux Kernel |
|
| References |
|
|
Status: PUBLISHED
Assigner: Linux
Published:
Updated: 2026-05-11T19:26:59.632Z
Reserved: 2025-12-30T12:26:05.425Z
Link: CVE-2022-50884
No data.
Status : Deferred
Published: 2025-12-30T13:16:03.493
Modified: 2026-04-15T00:35:42.020
Link: CVE-2022-50884
OpenCVE Enrichment
No data.
No weakness.